This article, the first in a series, argues for a precise definition and naming convention for the 21st-century acupuncture profession in the U.S.. The authors contend that calling practitioners "TCM practitioners" is inaccurate and misrepresents the profession. The original 17th-century translation of "acupuncture" from Chinese reduced a vast system to merely "piercing the skin," overlooking its profound theoretical foundations.

The U.S. practice is described as a hybrid blend of various Asian traditions, influenced by European interpretations, and now incorporating biomedical research. To accurately reflect this evolution and secure its place in mainstream healthcare, the article proposes specific terminology: "Acupuncture and Herbal Medicine" (capitalized) for the comprehensive system, "acupuncturist" for the practitioner, and "acupuncture" (lowercase) for the technique itself. This clear titling aims to provide inclusive unity, establish authority, and prevent "scope creep," ensuring proper educational standards for safety and competency. The goal is to strategically position the profession for growth and recognition within the U.S. healthcare system, leveraging its official designation by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.